Building a Dividend Stock Portfolio with a Late Start

It’s not too late, it’s never too late. Colonel Sanders didn’t start KFC until he was over 65. Look how big KFC is now.

dividend stock portfolio

Attempting to build a dividend stock portfolio when you are already in your 40s or 50s may be disappointing, especially when you see the kinds of magic compounding numbers I share about investing when you are in your 20s.

So you may not have 40+ years to allow small amounts of money to turn into millions. But you can still have at least 25 foreseeable years of compounding left in you if you are in your 50s, or even more.

Life expectancy has increased with the innovations in technology and medicine, and more and more people are living well into their 80s (big retirement companies like ING are shoving this down our throats with their commercials). It’s no mystery.

And so while I’m far from being an expert at your problems at 50, I do have expertise in helping hundreds of thousands of readers with starting to invest.

A particular question I received from a reader really caught my eye, and inspired this post. Hopefully it will help other people like him to kick excuses to the curb and make progress towards their goals.

Hi Andrew,

I happened to stumble upon einvestingforbeginners and have really enjoyed reading your articles/blogs – very informative and helpful.

I have $20K I would like to invest and want to begin building a dividend stock portfolio. I’m 49 years old, so unfortunately, I don’t have the benefit of an early start like someone in their 20s or 30s. That said, I have a few questions:

· What vehicle would you recommend I use to begin purchasing (brokerage firms, etc.)?
· I expect to have about $300-500 per month in savings to contribute on a go-forward basis – once I build the initial portfolio, would you recommend I use a lump sum approach for future purchases or just contribute on a monthly basis (dollar cost averaging) to grow the portfolio.

Any advice you have would be great appreciated. I look forward to hearing from you.

Thank you.


The first question is easy. I’ve covered it many times before and the best resource for you is probably this blog post: 8 Top Stock Market Brokers for Beginners.

The next question regards a dilemma between lump sum investing and dollar cost averaging.  Continue reading

How to Find Good Dividend Stocks: 3 Metrics

It’s easy to find plenty of websites willing to share a “top ten” list of good dividend stocks for the year. Yet it’s much harder to find actual useful lessons that will help you in the long term.

good dividend stocks

This frustrates me. Getting a quick tip about one good dividend stock won’t help anyone towards their financial goals.

Sure it feels good temporarily, but relying on new dividend stocks lists every year isn’t a reliable investment strategy.

So instead of give you what you’re looking for, presumably good dividend stocks, I’m going to teach you how to find good dividend stocks with 3 common metrics. I have no doubt this will be far more beneficial for you in the long term.

And it’s the long term that really matters.

Good Dividend Stocks: P/E

Let’s start with the most basic dividend metric. Price to earnings, or P/E ratio.

This ratio is simple to understand when explained correctly. It is the price you are paying for the earnings a company is giving you.

Look at it this way. If you buy a rental property for cash flow, the success of that investment depends on the price you paid for it and the cash flow it gives you.

A property that you paid $200,000 for might be a great deal if you can make $2,500 a month from it, and not such a great deal if you only make $1,500 a month from it. It’s not the dollar amounts, per se, but the ratio of price to earnings.

Buying dividend stocks works the same way. The lower the price to earnings on a company, the better deal you are getting on the company. It’s the simplest measurement of value.

Price to earnings works really well in helping you avoid extremely unfavorable situations. When a company is losing money, that stock will have a negative P/E ratio. You want to avoid negative P/E ratios at all costs because it indicates a company that is in serious trouble.

P/E also helps you avoid stocks that reach “bubble” territory. This is when Wall Street gets so excited about a stock that investors will literally pay anything to have it. A situation like this is so dangerous because the bubble always pops. We see it time and again.

For a good dividend stock, find a P/E less than 25.

Here’s the free tool I use to sort dividend stocks by P/E. It’s called FINVIZ, and it lets you sort from a wide variety of metrics. Simply select P/E: “Under 25” in the “Fundamental” Tab.

Good Dividend Stocks: D/E

The next dividend metric will help you avoid stocks that suddenly go bankrupt like Lehman Brothers did. I’m talking about the Debt to Equity ratio.

Debt to equity ratio works just like anybody’s personal finances. When people end up in bankruptcy court, it’s because they’ve accumulated too much debt on their credit cards, mortgages, and more. For stocks, it works the exact same way.  Continue reading

The Importance of Stocks with Dividends- Even Small Dividends

One of the biggest hurdles to stock market investing is a mindset shift. Many beginners can’t get their heads around the reasons to find stocks with dividends. And I don’t blame them.

stocks with dividends

After all, how can you get excited about a $1.15 payment that takes a year to accumulate? While on the surface, a small dividend may seem inconsequential…

I’m afraid that many beginner investors are missing the bigger picture. And as they miss this picture, they miss the most powerful worldly force for building wealth.

What we need is a road map towards making money in the stock market.

I’ll try to explain this in the simplest of terms. I’m hoping you’ll get a “light bulb moment” and it will help you see stocks with dividends in a much different way.

Once you understand the power behind it, you can go out and reap the benefits yourself.

Think of the following examples.

Take the game of Monopoly, for instance. We all know that the goal of the game is to collect as much money as possible. Coincidentally, this is the same goal in investing.

However, you don’t win the game of Monopoly by hoarding cash. You need to instead buy as many properties as you can. Those of you who are good at the game know that a few well placed houses and hotels on your properties will pay you thousands of Monopoly money in the long run.

In Monopoly, it costs money to buy properties and add houses and hotels. These properties don’t pay for themselves right away, yet you know that the key is to snatch up these properties as they will more than pay for themselves in the long term.

You have to look at stocks with dividends in this same way. You’re not buying them for the immediate return, but for the long term cash flows.

Tomatoes and Investing

Another simple example is planting a tomato garden. Let’s examine the goals and the effects. The goal of a tomato garden is for me to eat a tomato. This is obvious.

However, you don’t plant a tomato garden and expect to immediately start eating a tomato, or many tomatoes. You must plant the garden, water it, till it, and do other garden-like things to it (as you can tell, I’m not a green thumb).

But once the tomato plant has sprouted, it takes minimal work to maintain the garden. Plus you get not just one tomato, but an “income stream” of tomatoes. You must have the patience to reap the rewards, but the rewards are much plentiful than just buying a tomato at a store and consuming it.

The difference between buying a tomato to feed you once and a tomato seed to feed you indefinitely is the difference between buying a stock to make money and buying a stock for the dividend.

Notice that the goals are the same. In the tomato scenario, our goal is to eat a tomato. With investing, our goal is to make money. The difference is that you can take a long term approach for delayed gratification and greater benefit, or a short term gratification that quickly evaporates.

What’s interesting about the Monopoly example is that it utilizes a rare force in the world.

Most things in life take a great amount of upkeep and energy. The tomato plant, for example, requires maintenance– not as much effort as the initial plant but still significant. Exercise and our body takes constant effort and energy. I couldn’t possibly hope that one workout would have me “set for life”.

Money has a drain effect. It always seems to find a way to leak out of our wallets. We have to put constant effort and energy to keep an income at our jobs.

Monopoly properties don’t fall victim to this. You just buy it once, and it creates an income for you forever.

Guess what. Dividend paying stocks work the same way!!

Except in the real world, the best stocks with dividends will increase the payouts year after year. What this means is…

As long as you pick a company with strong financials, the income stream will pay you until you or the company dies! And those payments rise, that’s some serious earning power.

Let’s play this out with an example.  Continue reading

Stock Spreadsheet Q&A

Many long time readers know about the stock spreadsheet I offer as part of my book package. This is the exact spreadsheet I use when analyzing a company. It’s a simplified tool to help people buy stocks, but even within it there are questions and confusion.

stock spreadsheet

I had a couple of in-depth conversations with some of my readers and customers regarding the questions they had with the Value Trap Indicator Spreadsheet, and if they have these questions chances are many of you do too.

So I’ve included those questions with my answers in this post. Hopefully it will help those of you following along at home. It may just be the trigger you need to find the confidence in using spreadsheets for stocks.

Hi Andrew, I have a question about the seven categories. To calculate the 3 year average growth (category 6) do I use revenue or should I look at net income? And if my VTI is around 350 should I pass on this stock?

For 3 year average growth use net earnings.
A VTI of 350 is close to the strong buy signal of 250, so it’s worth keeping an eye on for a stock price pullback.

So can I use operating income? Or should I subtract interest and taxes?

Use net earnings which can be found on the income statement. Operating income minus interest and taxes won’t give you the same net earnings numbers that most of Wall Street is using (usually).

Do you use google as well to search through the financial statements? Or

I use because it is the definitive source. Not to say that other websites will be inaccurate but I prefer to get my data from the source.

In category 6 of the book you implement the growth. But how do I calculate the 3 year average growth in excel? Because at Finviz it isn’t mentioned. I calculated the 3 year average growth like this: Gemiddelde means average (I am from Belgium). But there is something not right about this formula because the outcome should be negative.

value spreadsheet

Great question. Using your example, you’d take earnings from 2014 – 2013 earnings, 2013 -2012, 2012-2011. Then take the average of this sum (divide the sum by 3). That’d be the average growth.

It gets interesting when negative numbers are involved, because it skews the data. I make the calculations in my spreadsheet, but basically I’ll take growth from the last positive earnings. For ex, to take growth of 2014, I’d subtract from 2012 instead of 2013 since 2013 is negative.  Continue reading

“If You’re so Good at Stock Market Investing, Why Share it?”

One of the most common questions or criticisms I hear from skeptics goes along the lines of:

“If you’re so successful at picking stocks, then why do you share that information to others”

or the usual, “if you’re making so much money, why do you need to sell the information? Why not keep it for yourself?

And it’s a good concern. I know I sure shared this perspective when I started out.

stock market investing

Look, there are scam artists and fakes out there. I’m not going to pretend that they exist. Charlatans thrive in every area of popular interest, and make their money by their ability to create excitement. Usually this excitement leads to reaching for the wallet, with little or no value exchange for the customer.

I don’t by any means support or condone this kind of behavior. It makes me sick to the depths of my stomach. I strongly believe in the power of capitalism, free trade and exchange of goods, but it’s these types of criminals who ruin the image of the system for everyone.

Why am I not a charlatan? Well for one, I practice what I preach. I’m eating my own cooking. Hell, my Roth IRA is composed solely from the stock picks I share to my newsletter subscribers. My financial future is at-risk just as my customers are.

Number two, I take pride in maintaining my integrity. I do what I say and say what I’ll do. I try to live this way not only in my investing life, but also in my regular life. No one’s perfect, but I hold myself to the highest standard.

Of course, those first two statements are nice to hear but they don’t get down to the core of what a customer needs. We need to know if this philosophy works.

Since I’ve been there before, in a position of a clueless beginner, I remember how important it was to me that I get the right stock market investing systems in place. So I took the kind of due diligence that most average investors just aren’t willing to take.

I had a bit of an ego going in– I knew I was getting a good start as a young kid, and I’ve always been extremely gifted in math. I figured that the skillset would carry over into stock market investing. It sure has.

Doing this due diligence meant learning about every kind of major stock market investing strategy. There’s value investing, which I eventually decided upon. But there’s also trend following, growth stock investing, index investing, technical analysis, asset allocation, bond investing, real estate investing, options trading, forex trading, large cap, small cap, international… and so much more.

I know the myriad of options seems endless. And it really is. There’s a million ways to skin a cat. But only until I could grasp the basics from each strategy, and be able to explain it to myself, was I finally confident in sharing about my findings.

A quick observation will show you who has the superior system. In basketball, it’s Phil Jackson and the triangle. In the music biz, it’s Rick Rubin. In the stock market, it’s the students of Graham and Dodd who built fortunes through value investing.

Identifying these masters and learning from them is the best way to accelerate your understanding and mastery of a skill. Plus and perhaps most importantly, the material needs to make sense.

Value investing passes every test, and it’s the only reason I’m so confident to share about it to my readers. The concepts make sense even to the layman. Simplicity is important.

Now for the big question…  Continue reading